Investor what-if analysis / unlevered
Test the assumptions that could change the decision
Adjust price, rent, vacancy, expenses, and owner occupancy to see how sensitive the screening economics are. Changes are temporary and do not rewrite the research record.
Scenario inputs
Market rents
Underlying evidence
Sources, caveats & notes
Low–medium qualitative confidence and only plausible if a conventional two-unit configuration is confirmed; do not promote from this estimate.
View sourceTotal context sources
View sourceView sourceView sourceView sourceView sourceView sourceOperating assumptions
Apparent unit count used for utilities
Why we believe this
Two physical units strongly supported; exact configuration and legal use remain unresolved.
View sourceView sourceOwner occupancy
Owner-occupied calculation is unavailable until a meaningful individual unit and its market rent can be identified.
All units at market rent
Property economic view
Operating expense breakdown
- Management
- $1,943 / yr
- Repairs
- $1,700 / yr
- Admin
- $729 / yr
- Tax
- $4,478 / yr
- Insurance
- $1,592 / yr
- Utilities
- $1,200 / yr
One identified modeled unit occupied by Nick
Owner-occupied view
Owner-occupied calculation is unavailable until a meaningful individual unit and its market rent can be identified.
Calculation method
- GPR
- Monthly rents × 12
- EGI
- GPR × (1 − vacancy)
- NOI
- EGI − management − repairs − admin − tax − insurance − utilities
- Reserve-adjusted cash
- NOI − (GPR × recurring CapEx rate)
- Cap rate / GRM
- NOI ÷ price / price ÷ annual GPR
- Owner cash
- Third-party EGI − third-party management − full property non-management expenses − full reserve + Nick contribution
Input evidence & scenario lineage
Results are model-derived screening estimates. User edits are session-only estimates; all original evidence states, conflicts and source references remain below.
Active overrides
- Owner slot: UNKNOWN. Nick contribution: UNKNOWN / mo. UNKNOWN.
Vacancy
Management
Why we believe this
Market-rate management remains included even when self-management is considered separately.
View sourceRepairs
Why we believe this
Older-property screening placeholder; too generic for acquisition underwriting.
View sourceView sourceAdmin
Tax
Why we believe this
Comparison assumption only; not a parcel-specific buyer tax prediction.
View sourceInsurance
Why we believe this
Comparison placeholder only; property-specific quote and terms control.
View sourceView sourceUtilitiesperunit
Why we believe this
Placeholder only; utility history and meter configuration are required for acquisition underwriting.
View sourceView sourceCapex
Why we believe this
Older-property screening reserve; not a substitute for an inspection-based immediate CapEx budget.
View sourceView sourceYear built
Why we believe this
Strong secondary corroboration; direct authoritative record not archived.
View sourceView sourcePhysical unit count
Why we believe this
Two physical units strongly supported; exact configuration and legal use remain unresolved.
View sourceView sourceExact unit mix
- Current aggregate marketing
- 4BR/3BA
- Older marketing
- 2 x 2BR/1BA
- Child a record
- 2BR/2BA with whole-building 1,710 sf attached
Why we believe this
Exact bedroom/bathroom configuration must be established before underwriting.
View sourceView sourceView sourceRoom rental evidence
Why we believe this
Room-rental asking evidence creates operating ambiguity and must not be multiplied into whole-unit rent.
View sourceLegal two unit use
Current lease rent
Why we believe this
Exact unit schedule, leases, and collections are required.
No source attached